|
Posté le 07-05-2019 à 13:45 | #
|
Hi, I would love to know if your program can also been used for the Casio Algebra FX 2.0 plus (or graph 100+). It would really help me a lot! Thanks a lot in advance: D |
|
|
Posté le 07-05-2019 à 14:07 | #
|
In principle, the Alegbra FX can run Casio Basic programs such as this one. However the interpreter has never been updated with more recent features, so I can't give a full guarantee. The best way to know is to go ahead and try it, as it won't break anything anyway |
|
|
Posté le 07-05-2019 à 15:15 | #
|
HI Lephenixnoir, Thank u for andwer. I tried to copy the source code of this .g1m via FA-124 and then I created a .cat again via FA-124 that I transferred to my FX 2.0 Plus but the interpreter gives me syntax errors and I think it's due to the fact that fx 2.0 plus has no strings. |
|
|
Posté le 07-05-2019 à 15:19 | #
|
That is correct. If the program uses strings then there's not much you can do about it.
I looked at the code and strings are used to automatically edit the formula of the transfer function, there seems to be no simple way to patch it. |
|
|
Posté le 07-05-2019 à 15:26 | #
|
I understand, thank you very much anyway. Maybe let's see if @Dark storm is able to create a version of its own program for FX 2.0 plus and similar, only if it's possible and if he wants it of course. Thanks again |
|
|
Posté le 19-05-2019 à 20:07 | #
|
Hi ! This program needs the strings to compute the discrete transfert function. I should be able to remove those requirements, but you'll need to edit the program everytime you want to compute another transfert function. |
|
|
Posté le 14-06-2019 à 11:04 | #
|
Hi Dark Storm, for me is good <<you'll need to edit the program everytime you want to compute another transfert function.>> if u can say me what to do and if it is not to complicated for you to remove those requirements. Thanks again |
|
|
Posté le 18-06-2019 à 12:25 | #
|
These days I tried to recreate some features, taking inspiration from your program, and something works, but I'm not good enough to recreate it completely. |
|